How to fix ERROR_TRANSACTION_INVALID_MARSHALL_BUFFER (6713 | 0x1A39 | 0x80071A39) – Invalid PushTransaction/PullTransaction marshaling buffer

Mr Fix It

Administrator
Staff member
Feb 8, 2026
2,991
0
36
This error means the byte buffer you passed to PushTransaction or PullTransaction is not a valid KTM transaction marshaling blob.
In plain terms:
“You’re trying to import/export a transaction context, but the data you supplied is not a real (or not a compatible) transaction buffer.”
This is a marshaling/serialization format violation, not corruption of the disk, not permissions, and not a “retry later” condition.

Error code equivalence (same error, different formats)​

FormatCode
Win32 (decimal)6713
Win32 (hex)0x1A39
HRESULT0x80071A39
Symbolic nameERROR_TRANSACTION_INVALID_MARSHALL_BUFFER
MessageThe buffer passed in to PushTransaction or PullTransaction is not in a valid format.
Fact: 0x80071A39 is the HRESULT-wrapped form of Win32 error 6713.

What this error really means​

Windows KTM supports moving a transaction context across boundaries (thread, process, RPC, etc.) using:
  • PullTransactionimports a marshaled transaction into the current thread context
  • PushTransactionexports the current thread transaction into a marshaled buffer
This error occurs when the provided buffer:
  • Is not a KTM marshaled transaction at all
  • Is truncated (wrong size)
  • Is corrupted in transit (bad encoding/serialization)
  • Is from a different API/version/architecture context that can’t be interpreted
  • Was produced incorrectly (wrong function, wrong flags, wrong buffer length)
KTM enforces strict format validation because a malformed buffer could imply:
  • invalid handles
  • bogus security context
  • broken transaction identity
  • potential memory safety risks

Common real-world scenarios that trigger this error​

1) Buffer truncation or size mismatch (most common)​

Cause
  • Sending the buffer through an API that truncates binary data
  • Using string functions (null-terminated) on a binary blob
  • Incorrect length passed to PullTransaction
Typical signs
  • Works for small payloads, fails randomly under different sizes
  • Buffer length differs between producer and consumer

2) Treating binary blob as text (base64/hex mistakes)​

Cause
  • Converting marshaled bytes to a string without encoding safely
  • Dropping bytes due to charset conversions (UTF-8/UTF-16)
  • Incorrect base64 decode or missing padding
Typical signs
  • Errors appear only when sent across HTTP/JSON/XML
  • Buffer “looks readable” when it shouldn’t

3) Wrong buffer source (not produced by PushTransaction)​

Cause
  • Attempting to feed a transaction handle, GUID, or custom struct
  • Using TxF/TxR artifacts or unrelated blobs
Typical signs
  • Always fails, deterministic
  • “Buffer” format doesn’t match expected KTM blob length/structure

4) Cross-process / cross-session misuse without proper duplication​

Cause
  • Exported transaction context is used in a different security/session boundary
  • Buffer is valid but cannot be bound in the target context
Typical signs
  • Works within same process, fails over RPC/service boundary
  • Fails only when service runs under different account

5) Mixed architecture / ABI mismatch (x86 vs x64)​

Cause
  • Marshaled blob produced in one environment and interpreted in another with incompatible assumptions
  • Wrong struct packing around calls, especially in P/Invoke or manual bindings
Typical signs
  • Works on x64, fails on x86 (or vice versa)
  • Only fails in specific build configurations

What this error is NOT​

  • ❌ Not a disk corruption issue
  • ❌ Not a permissions/ACL problem
  • ❌ Not fixed by retries
  • ❌ Not a generic transaction abort
  • ❌ Not a CLFS container issue
This is a bad input buffer problem.

Real fixes & solutions (correct order matters)​

Step 1: Confirm you are using the correct APIs for marshaling​

You must:
  • Generate the buffer using PushTransaction (or the correct KTM marshaling API path)
  • Consume the buffer using PullTransaction
Do not invent your own buffer format or pass handles/GUIDs.

Step 2: Preserve the buffer as raw bytes end-to-end​

Golden rule:
A marshaled transaction buffer is binary, not text.
Correct handling:
  • Treat it as byte[] / BLOB
  • Store and transmit with explicit length
  • Avoid null-terminated string APIs (strlen, wcslen, etc.)
If transmitting over text-only channels:
  • Encode as Base64 (recommended)
  • Decode back to exact original bytes before PullTransaction

Step 3: Validate buffer length and integrity at both ends​

At minimum:
  • Log the buffer length produced by PushTransaction
  • Log the buffer length received before PullTransaction
  • Verify they match exactly
Common failure:
  • Copying into a smaller buffer
  • Using the wrong length variable (characters vs bytes)

Step 4: Fix marshaling across process/service boundaries​

If crossing boundaries:
  • Ensure the receiving side is allowed to bind that transaction context
  • Ensure consistent security context expectations
  • Avoid sending transaction blobs across unrelated sessions unless the design explicitly supports it
In many architectures, the correct approach is:
  • Perform transactional work within one boundary (service-side)
  • Expose higher-level “unit of work” operations instead of shipping KTM context around

Step 5: Fix P/Invoke / interop definitions (developers)​

If you call these APIs via interop:
  • Confirm parameter types are correct (BYTE*, lengths in bytes)
  • Confirm structure packing and calling convention
  • Confirm x86/x64 builds use correct signatures
Interop mistakes commonly cause:
  • incorrect buffer length passed
  • pointer misalignment
  • stack corruption leading to invalid blob interpretation

Step 6: Consider deprecations and redesign if using TxF/TxR patterns​

If your design relies heavily on:
  • Transactional NTFS (TxF)
  • Transactional Registry (TxR)
Be aware:
  • These are deprecated
  • Cross-boundary KTM marshaling may be fragile in modern environments
Prefer:
  • Application-level transaction contexts
  • Database transactions
  • Explicit operation batching within a single service/process boundary

Fast “symptom → fix” mapping​

  • Fails after sending over JSON/HTTP → Blob treated as text → Base64 encode/decode
  • Fails intermittently → Truncation/length mismatch → Preserve bytes + explicit length
  • Always fails → Not produced by PushTransaction → Generate correct KTM blob
  • Fails only across service boundary → Session/account mismatch → Keep transaction inside service
  • Fails only on x86/x64 → Interop signature/packing issue → Fix ABI and lengths

Related transaction marshaling / context errors (context map)​

Code / HRESULTMeaning
6711 (0x1A37)Transaction already exists in thread context
6712 (0x1A38)Transaction propagation failed
6713 (0x1A39)Invalid marshaling buffer (this error)
6714 (0x1A3A)Invalid transaction cookie / context data
6701 (0x1A2D)Transaction not active

Practical diagnostic checklist​

  • Was the buffer produced by PushTransaction (not custom data)?
  • Are you preserving it as raw bytes (no string conversions)?
  • Do producer/consumer lengths match exactly?
  • Are you transmitting via Base64 if using text channels?
  • Are you crossing a security/session boundary incorrectly?
  • Are your interop signatures correct for x86/x64?

Note​

ERROR_TRANSACTION_INVALID_MARSHALL_BUFFER is a strict input validation error.
Windows is refusing to import/export a transaction context because the buffer is not a valid KTM marshaled transaction blob.
The correct fix is to generate the buffer using the proper KTM API, preserve it byte-for-byte with the correct length, avoid text conversions, and ensure interop/architecture correctness—especially when crossing process or service boundaries.
 

About WIN32

  • WIN32 is a community-driven Windows troubleshooting forum focused on understanding, diagnosing, and fixing Windows error codes, system failures, and low-level operating system issues.
  • The platform brings together users, IT professionals, and system enthusiasts to share real-world solutions for Win32, HRESULT, NTSTATUS, BSOD, driver, update, security, and networking errors.
  • Independent community forum. Not affiliated with Microsoft or any hardware manufacturers, software vendors, or service providers. Information shared is for educational and general guidance purposes only.

Quick Navigation

User Menu